Prediction of Koki Matsuda [825th] vs Steffan Van Weldam [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W L W
Form
W L L L L L W W W LHead To Head: Matsuda 1 - 0 Weldam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matsuda winning 2 and Weldam winning 0. The last match between Matsuda and Weldam was at the M15 Hinode, 12-03-2025, First, Hard with Koki Matsuda getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Koki Matsuda | 1 |
| Steffan Van Weldam | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Koki Matsuda
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:22:35 | Average Match Time | 1:22:35 |
| 53% (24/45) | 1st Serve % | 62% (37/60) |
| 75% (18/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (21/37) |
| 67% (14/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 29% (13/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Koki Matsuda vs Steffan Van Weldam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matsuda 1 - 0 Weldam
Editorial Prediction:
When delving into the depths of second serve performance over the past six months, Matsuda has an edge with a win rate of 45.52% compared to Weldam's 44.74%. It's intriguing to consider how this slight difference could influence their match outcome. The correlation between second serve success and match results allows us to ponder: will Matsuda's slight upper hand give him the advantage he needs to come out on top?
Now, turning our gaze to return game statistics, Matsuda's supremacy shines through once more. He has outperformed by winning 48.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Weldam trails with 36.84%. However, Weldam shows resilience against first serves, capturing 34.95% of those points compared to Matsuda's 26.6%. These metrics paint a vivid picture of who might dominate in specific aspects of their head-to-head encounter, nudging the prediction scales in Matsuda's favor.
What about the high-pressure situations of tennis, where champions are molded? Matsuda's breakpoint saving percentage stands at 48.19%, a testament to his nerve under pressure, whereas Weldam lags behind at 35.71%. For those placing bets, this statistic cries out for attention.
With a win ratio of 54.9% over the past year, Matsuda clearly leads in the win tally (28/23), overshadowing Weldam's 36.84% (7/12). This record lends a certain aura of expectation around Matsuda as the likely victor, given his superior track record. On hard surfaces, Matsuda boasts a career win percentage of 67% (8/4), his performance dropping to 39% on clay (7/11). Meanwhile, Weldam thrives best on hard courts as well, winning 57% (4/3), but his record plummets on indoor hard courts to a dismal 0% (0/4).
The level at which players participate is a crucial deciding factor. Both athletes have primarily been competing in the lower-tier Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, where, again, Matsuda's higher win percentage places him as the more seasoned competitor under similar conditions. In terms of opponent quality, Matsuda faced adversaries with an average rank of 364.75, significantly higher-ranked than those played by Weldam, averaging a rank of 11.16. Such experience against formidable foes may prove invaluable in tipping the scales.
If their match extends into a deciding set, Weldam appears twice as likely to clinch victory, with a 33% success rate versus Matsuda's mere 19%. Despite this, overall, the other statistical indicators project Matsuda as the slightly more favorable contender.
Should the action reach breakpoint scenarios, Weldam demonstrates a slight superiority, converting 40% of opportunities compared to Matsuda's 37.5%. While betting enthusiasts might see this as a live-edge scenario, the cumulative data tilt the balance in Matsuda’s favor. Therefore, although nuances exist, Matsuda emerges as the probable winner when one weighs all factors.
Koki Matsuda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Koki Matsuda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Koki Matsuda
Player
Issei Okamura
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Koki Matsuda
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Koki Matsuda
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Steffan Van Weldam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Koki Matsuda
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rafael Ymer
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
25%
(
8 of
32)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rahul Dhokia
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Vincent
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-7(2) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Steffan Van Weldam
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
13 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steffan Van Weldam
Player
Anatolii Mironov
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
10
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (59/49) | Win/Loss | 34% (14/27) |
| 57% (142/107) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (36/58) |
| 53% (1262/1125) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (389/490) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 305 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 144 | Total Double Faults | 50 |
| 1:26:40 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 429.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 47.63 |
| 64% (3781/5868) | 1st Serve % | 58% (356/619) |
| 67% (2545/3781) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (212/356) |
| 48% (996/2088) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (103/263) |
| 44% (252/576) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (36/77) |
| 40% (2348/5930) | Return Points Win % | 45% (296/653) |
| 54% (57/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 34% (14/41) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (14/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 25% (8/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 84% (62/52) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 71% (17/12) |
| 16% (62/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 29% (17/5) |
| 15% (46/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (24/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
